{"id":3311,"date":"2011-05-19T18:54:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-19T18:54:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/test.simple-talk.com\/uncategorized\/visual-studio-vnext\/"},"modified":"2016-07-28T10:50:25","modified_gmt":"2016-07-28T10:50:25","slug":"visual-studio-vnext","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/blogs\/visual-studio-vnext\/","title":{"rendered":"Visual Studio vNext"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>At TechEd this year, there&#8217;s only a few sessions and expo booths aimed squarely at devs rather than sysadmins and DBAs, but one of the things I picked up on was what&#8217;s going into Visual Studio vNext.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s no shiny new UI features (that they&#8217;ve announced so far&#8230;) but they are doing a whole lot of work improving the performance and memory usage of VS &#8211; parallel builds (already supported in core MSBuild, just not used in VS up to now), and spinning off a separate process to do each build. This really cuts down the memory usage of VS, as it doesn&#8217;t have to load all the user&#8217;s assemblies into the VS process space. In the demo they gave, VS2010 used 224MB of memory after a solution rebuild, and vNext used 43MB on the same project rebuild. Separating the builds into a different process also means that VS remains fully responsive when doing a build.<\/p>\n<p>They&#8217;ve also re-written the Add References screen, so it now loads instantaneously, rather than the &gt;5 minutes it currently takes. Rather understandably, this got a big cheer in the session!<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s not just limited to performance though; there&#8217;s a new Solution Explorer that integrates much of the file structure (classes, methods, fields&#8230;) previously available in separate analysis windows. They&#8217;ve also hidden most of the main UI toolbar buttons that are visible in 2010 to make it far less cluttered; added Find dialogs to various bits of the UI to try and consolidate the 3 or 4 separate ways to search for things in 2010; and improved multi-monitor support to allow fully independent windows.<\/p>\n<p>As a side effect of not adding any big new features, they don&#8217;t have to revbump the project file format. This means that 2010 projects don&#8217;t have to go through an upgrade wizard, and you can freely switch between 2010 and vNext on the same project. This feature may only be a result of what work they decided to do in vNext, but it still got a big cheer when it was announced!<\/p>\n<p>Basically, there&#8217;s no big shiny new features, but lots of little changes to make devs&#8217; lives easier and fix a few of the issues that people have been complaining about in previous versions. <\/p>\n<p>The VS team are still doing active development on performance issues, so they&#8217;ve made available an extension called <a href=\"http:\/\/visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com\/fa85b17d-3df2-49b1-bee6-71527ffef441\">PerfWatson<\/a> that detects when VS is taking too long to do something, and sends anonymous data back to Microsoft with information on what was hogging the CPU at the time. I do recommend you install this; any performance issues you have will be much more likely to be fixed with the stack trace information PerfWatson provides to the development team.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At TechEd this year, there&#8217;s only a few sessions and expo booths aimed squarely at devs rather than sysadmins and DBAs, but one of the things I picked up on was what&#8217;s going into Visual Studio vNext. There&#8217;s no shiny new UI features (that they&#8217;ve announced so far&#8230;) but they are doing a whole lot&#8230;&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":186659,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-3311","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blogs"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3311","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/186659"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3311"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3311\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25276,"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3311\/revisions\/25276"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3311"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3311"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3311"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=3311"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}