{"id":2373,"date":"2006-09-28T05:48:00","date_gmt":"2006-09-28T05:48:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/test.simple-talk.com\/uncategorized\/vaporising-users\/"},"modified":"2016-07-28T10:48:54","modified_gmt":"2016-07-28T10:48:54","slug":"vaporising-users","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/blogs\/vaporising-users\/","title":{"rendered":"Vaporising users"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Developing a usable application requires that you pay particular attention to who you&#8217;re designing for.&#160; That statement isn&#8217;t exactly rocket surgery, but it becomes rocket surgery when you begin to realise that everyone has their own ideas of who their users are.&#160; <\/p>\n<p> Faced with broad labels, such as &#8216; software developer&#8217; or &#8216;dba&#8217;, it can be tricky to get consensus on skill levels, attitudes and goals.&#160; What you then discover is that one person&#8217;s idea of your user&#8217;s ability is magically exaggerated when they&#8217;re arguing a case for assumed user knowledge, and then somewhat diminished at other occasions when you&#8217;re arguing the case for a feature that would take a lot of development time.<\/p>\n<p> Fortunately, we usability people have thought about this.&#160; You&#8217;ll find that it&#8217;s hard to pick up a usability book that doesn&#8217;t mention personas in some form or another, confidently claiming how they&#8217;ll ensure everyone knows who your users really are.<\/p>\n<p> Excellent.&#160; Jobsa good&#8217;n.&#160; Time for a pint of warm froffy ale and a quick read of &#8216;That&#8217;s me sorted&#8217; magazine.<\/p>\n<p> Only, that&#8217;s not quite the end of the story.&#160; Personas are tools we use to specify a user archetype.&#160; They represent a broad group of people as a single user who is easier to relate to, understand and design for.&#160; Satisfy your persona and you satisfy the group.&#160; So clearly, you need to think long and hard about the group to ensure that your persona is representative.&#160; Most projects have a couple of personas representing groups of people with differing needs.<\/p>\n<p> Hard as that is, it&#8217;s not impossible and creating believable and representative personas is a great way to start a project.&#160; Customer visits, forum and support feedback as well as market research are all rich avenues of information about your real customer needs.&#160; <\/p>\n<p> No, what&#8217;s really tricky is integrating personas into your development team and extracting the full worth of what a persona is good at &#8211; i.e. ensuring everyone knows the goals, behaviours and skills of your users.&#160; What typically happens is that unless everyone is completely sold on the idea (and reminded almost daily), it&#8217;s easy to lapse back into the mindset of imagining a malleable user that changes according to your needs.<\/p>\n<p> Red Gate are pretty close to getting the full benefit of using personas and their associated scenarios, but in the next coming weeks, I&#8217;m looking to implement a few more ideas to have us living and breathing our users.<\/p>\n<p> To that end, I&#8217;ll be vaporising any appropriate users and feeding the resultant er&#8230; vapor&#8230; into the air conditioning.&#160; Any volunteers?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Developing a usable application requires that you pay particular attention to who you&#8217;re designing for.&#160; That statement isn&#8217;t exactly rocket surgery, but it becomes rocket surgery when you begin to realise that everyone has their own ideas of who their users are.&#160; Faced with broad labels, such as &#8216; software developer&#8217; or &#8216;dba&#8217;, it can&#8230;&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":54375,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-2373","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blogs"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2373","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/54375"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2373"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2373\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41433,"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2373\/revisions\/41433"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2373"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2373"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2373"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.red-gate.com\/simple-talk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=2373"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}