| Author |
Message |
fatherjack
Joined: 13 Mar 2007 Posts: 224 Location: Cornwall
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:07 pm Post subject: feature request - filter/alert by process name |
|
|
Hi,
I only have the demo version installed currently whilst I persuade the man with the budget to shell out the necessary for our servers but have noticed that the alerts I am getting fall into two broad categories:
1 - "Oh yeah, that always takes that long, etc"
and
2 - "Need to look at that"
those in category 1 are things like backups, replication, etc that have a set Process Name value and can really be ignored. If my merge process has a block then its no catastrophe, especially if its only blocking itself or if a backup job (we use SQL Backup) takes a normal duration the Long running query alert is triggered (SQBCoreService.exe is the process name) and leads to a false alert. I cant filter out the process to avoid this getting in and muddying the waters of the SQL that is attempting data access and is running slowly - a Category 2 alert.
Is there any way to allow for different thresholds for alerts according to parameters other than server and alert? If we could add a new alert that is a copy of the original but has a higher/lower threshold for a particular process please?
cheers
also just found out that if i clear an alert it isnt that particular instance of the alert that is cleared, its the whole list of alerts in view. I just 60 alerts when i only wanted to get shot of the one that was in the details view. Is there any way to view the occurrences in a table/grid for an alert rather than the drop down list box please?
thanks again
PS still havent got the budget sorted yet ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dlkj
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 150 Location: Red Gate Software, Cambridge
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
Thanks for your feedback. I've logged your feature request to display and configure processes based alerts by process name as issue SSR-1350.
I think this would solve both of your issues and we will consider this for a future version of SQL Response.
Cheers,
--
Daniel |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fatherjack
Joined: 13 Mar 2007 Posts: 224 Location: Cornwall
|
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Daniel,
Having spent more time in the application I think these are being grouped together because the Detail column is blank/empty. Maybe just getting the Process Name or something into the Detail if the Detail is otherwise empty would sort it ...?
cheers
Jonathan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group