| Author |
Message |
PostMoved
Joined: 16 May 2011
Posts: 4
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:10 pm Post subject: Why not place the original code back in (free) open source? |
 |
|
| $35 is not free |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AlexanderMorou
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 5:54 pm Post subject: Re: Why not place the original code back in the (free) ... |
|
|
Because it was never open source.
Further, I'm pretty sure Lutz wasn't planning on keeping it free forever. If he were planning on making it free, he wouldn't have given it to a company, that sells products, he would've released the source.
The source which, even through itself is cryptic because it uses an obfuscator, and other build tools that consolidate multiple components into one. If he wanted it to be free forever, he would've released the source.
He didn't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
