| Author |
Message |
PDinCA
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 464 Location: Costa Mesa, CA, USA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 6:05 pm Post subject: Need faster way to get going involving Replication |
|
|
Referencing post: http://www.red-gate.com/messageboard/viewtopic.php?t=12209
I also have issues bringing the core system down for 'n' hours while I:Kill data acquisition
Kill Replication
Backup the Publisher DB (160GB+ data file)
Backup the Subscriber DB (35GB+ data file)
Restore Pub
Restore Sub
Rebuild Replication
(and that's if I don't do the recommended parallel database method.)
Based on current times, installing and commissioning on the Production server, SS2005 Enterprise, will take at least 6 hours, as rebuilding replication takes about 4 hours!
This seems like an entirely unreasonable length of time to take the core business system down - assuming all goes well end-to-end.
Is there no quicker way the transition can be effected? Are efforts underway down-under to perhaps make the downtime much shorter?
Those of us with large-enough DBs and Replication implications are presented with a hard pill to swallow, let alone convincing Management that the downtime window is "this big" and there's no other path to storage compression but through that hole...
Thoughts? Plans? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eddie davis
Joined: 14 Jun 2006 Posts: 796 Location: Red Gate Software
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi, thank you your post into the forum.
Please accept my apologies, I am little confused my your post.
Are you seeking to change how SQL Storage Compress operates when you initially configure or setup a database to use the product?
Many Thanks
Eddie _________________ Eddie Davis
Technical Support Engineer
Red Gate Software Ltd
E-mail: support@red-gate.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PDinCA
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 464 Location: Costa Mesa, CA, USA
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Eddie,
I'm having a very helpful conversation with Jeff @ HyperBac, courtesy of Angus. There is another way to enroll databases in SC but the downside appears to be that unless the data are very well physically organized at the point of enrollment, much lower compression ratios will be realized.
My problem lies in the fact that the 2 DBs I have are 160GB and 35GB data, with the 35GB being the subscriber to a single 124GB table in the larger DB. It takes about four hours to reestablish replication, so I was inquiring whether there was a way to minimize outage by not having to backup and restore each DB, then redo replaication from scratch.
We're nearing the end of the question and answer. I'll post what we find when complete. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group