Red Gate forums :: View topic - Did RedGate pay Lutz Roeder for Reflector?
Return to www.red-gate.com RSS Feed Available

Search  | Usergroups |  Profile |  Messages |  Log in  Register 
Go to product documentation
.NET Reflector 7.0 Feedback
.NET Reflector 7.0 Feedback forum

Did RedGate pay Lutz Roeder for Reflector?

Search in .NET Reflector 7.0 Feedback forum
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Jump to:  
Author Message
Ettery



Joined: 02 Feb 2011
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:55 am    Post subject: Did RedGate pay Lutz Roeder for Reflector? Reply with quote

Just asking. Maybe someone at RedGate could answer?

My impression was that RedGate took over the tool on condition that they would continue to offer a free version. No doubt they knew it would bring them some profile and traffic in the .NET community. The software and community were already built.

Whether you did or not, you should demonstrate your integrity by open-sourcing the code at the point where you took it over. I think it's fair then that you get paid for any additional value you have added... but anything else makes you look downright dishonest.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JDelekto



Joined: 05 Feb 2011
Posts: 21

PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 4:10 pm    Post subject: Re: Did RedGate pay Lutz Roeder for Reflector? Reply with quote

Ettery wrote:
Just asking. Maybe someone at RedGate could answer?

My impression was that RedGate took over the tool on condition that they would continue to offer a free version. No doubt they knew it would bring them some profile and traffic in the .NET community. The software and community were already built.

Whether you did or not, you should demonstrate your integrity by open-sourcing the code at the point where you took it over. I think it's fair then that you get paid for any additional value you have added... but anything else makes you look downright dishonest.


The source code for Lutz Roeder's Reflector (at least from the versions I have used up until Red-Gate had acquired it) was not "Open Source" and I do not think the Open Source community has any reason or right to strong arm a company into releasing any intellectual property that they have acquired through legal means.

Perhaps you should do what the "Open Source" community did for Blender, collect the money and buy it from the 'bank'. Then, if the 'bank' decides to hand it over, you can bend it, shape it - any way you want it.

Just because a person gives their application away for 'free' out of the goodness of their heart does not mean it is "Open Source" or open season.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group