Red Gate forums :: View topic - What does Lutz Roeder think about all this?
Return to www.red-gate.com RSS Feed Available

Search  | Usergroups |  Profile |  Messages |  Log in  Register 
Go to product documentation
.NET Reflector 7.0 Feedback
.NET Reflector 7.0 Feedback forum

What does Lutz Roeder think about all this?

Search in .NET Reflector 7.0 Feedback forum
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Jump to:  
Author Message
TimE



Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:12 am    Post subject: What does Lutz Roeder think about all this? Reply with quote

In my mind, his is the single most important voice in all this. Outside Redgate, he alone knows just what, if any, promises or assurances were made, and whether this action breaches such. We like to assume that it does, to justify our indignation. Personally, though, Lutz is the only person whose opinion on this matters to me beyond my own personal feelings.

I believe developers deserve to be paid for their work if that is the agreement they make with their users. But Lutz never asked me for money, and in fact visibly assured us:

"Red Gate will continue to provide the free community version and is looking for your feedback and ideas for future versions."
http://blog.lutzroeder.com/2008/08/future-of-net-reflector.html

It is interesting to note, however, that assurance was not a part of Redgate's official announcement page at
http://www.red-gate.com/our-company/about/news/net-reflector
nor the SimpleTalk article
http://www.simple-talk.com/opinion/opinion-pieces/the-future-of-reflector-/
they and Lutz both reference on their respective announcement pages.

I wonder if this is reflective of differences in the two parties' understanding of whatever agreement there was?

Copying this post at the below location:
http://bloodgate.wordpress.com/2011/02/03/what-does-lutz-roeder-think-of-redgates-reflector-move/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wellilein



Joined: 04 Feb 2011
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 12:29 am    Post subject: Ask Lutz to make it Open Source Reply with quote

Idea We should ask Lutz to make his version open source if he did not sell it to RedGate. Maybe he still owns the initial creator rights and is able to do so.
This will bring us some years back, but that's not too bad.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KristoferA



Joined: 04 Feb 2011
Posts: 7
Location: Bangkok

PostPosted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 5:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think you're forgetting something important: Lutz didn't give away his work for free.

If he wanted to do that, he could of course have released it as open source through codeplex or whatever. He didn't do that; he sold it to Redgate.

Instead of going through the hassle of charging each individual user, he charged Redgate for his work and left it to them to figure out how to charge the users. They tried freemium, and decided it didn't work so now they're trying a different licensing model.

I can imagine that both Mr Roeder and Redgate have invested a lot of time and money into this excellent tool. Isn't it fair that they get paid for their work/investment? I think it is.
_________________
Cool tools for Linq-to-SQL and Entity Framework 4: http://huagati.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group