Red Gate forums :: View topic - Build Failed - assembly needs to be signed with a strong nam
Return to www.red-gate.com RSS Feed Available

Search  | Usergroups |  Profile |  Messages |  Log in  Register 
Go to product documentation
SmartAssembly 5
SmartAssembly 5 forum

Build Failed - assembly needs to be signed with a strong nam

Search in SmartAssembly 5 forum
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
Jump to:  
Author Message
maitpg1



Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 2:37 pm    Post subject: Build Failed - assembly needs to be signed with a strong nam Reply with quote

Why does v5 require a strong name to enable 'resource compression and encryption', 'error reporting', or 'string compression and encryption'? This was not a requirement in v4.2.
I can't give my assembly a strong name because it uses references that I don't own and can't assign strong names to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
maitpg1



Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 9:28 pm    Post subject: Update from support Reply with quote

The message below was the response I received from Red Gate support:

Quote:
I am currently discussing with the developers about the change to having strong name signed assemblies for certain protections as it is very over-restrictive (there are plenty of situations where you can not strong name sign an assembly because of trust setting which could prevent you loading dependencies). The change was added to improve security as one of the developers working in a different part of Red Gate came up with a potential attack vector on the protection methods that used compression. As all a potential hacker could do was get at the uncompressed, but still fully encrypted data, it was not a major issue but one that needed to fixed. Hopefully we should be able to provide a better way of protection if you aren't able to strong name signing.


Darn developers... always think they know what's best. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alex.Davies



Joined: 02 Dec 2008
Posts: 335
Location: Cambridge, uk

PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We've worked around this by only doing the check for the attack when you choose to sign your assembly. Get in touch with support if you need a fixed build before we release it.

Cheers,
_________________
Alex
Developer,
Red Gate .NET Tools
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group