Red Gate forums :: View topic - Add Objects to Project does not display Schema prefix
Return to www.red-gate.com RSS Feed Available

Search  | Usergroups |  Profile |  Messages |  Log in  Register 
Go to product documentation
SQL Dependency Tracker 2
SQL Dependency Tracker 2 forum

Add Objects to Project does not display Schema prefix

Search in SQL Dependency Tracker 2 forum
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Jump to:  
Author Message
Tormod



Joined: 11 Dec 2008
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:04 pm    Post subject: Add Objects to Project does not display Schema prefix Reply with quote

Even when the options are set to show schema name, this only has effect in the main view, not in the "Add Objects to Project" dialog.

It is hard to add stuff when their names are equal across the different schemas.

The order of the objects appears to be sorted on schema name, but it should display it as well. The first thing I would like to do when using the "search" function is to type in "Valvetest." (Schema name) and then use the tree view to navigate among the relevant table, SP's etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Linda Hawksworth



Joined: 25 Jun 2007
Posts: 192

PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have logged this as a feature request in our tracking system and it will be considered for a future release of SQL Dependency Tracker. We currently have no timescales for this.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
alex.weatherall



Joined: 29 Nov 2005
Posts: 42

PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,

I'd like to second this feature.

I think that it's important that all Red-Gate's products should refer to Schema and Object Name in the object lists.

I also think the schema should be referred to as Schema as well (not Owner as SQL Compare does). I do understand the problem of backwards compatibility with SQL Server 2000 as it doesn't have schemas explicitly, but I think that as Owner effectively stood for Schema in 2000 and no longer does in 2005> then the change of description is valid.

Please see my request in the SQL Data Compare 8 (Early Access Program) forum http://www.red-gate.com/MessageBoard/viewtopic.php?t=8935 for more information.

Thanks

Alex
_________________
Alex Weatherall
TeleWare.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scottt732



Joined: 23 Jan 2009
Posts: 6
Location: New Brunswick, NJ

PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:52 pm    Post subject: Re: Reply with quote

alex.weatherall wrote:
I think that it's important that all Red-Gate's products should refer to Schema and Object Name in the object lists.


I definitely agree. I'm in the painstaking process of refactoring a huge database and the fact that an object belongs to the dbo schema tells me that I haven't refactored that SP yet.

Scott
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group